EFL Students’ Agility in Online Learning During the Covid-19: A Gender Study

Authors

  • Ihsan Tanama Sitio Magister Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
  • Good Lingga Magister Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
  • Mutia Nursyafitri Nasution Magister Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.
  • Alemina Br. Perangin-angin Faculty of Cultural Sciences, Universitas Sumatera Utara, Medan, Indonesia.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32734/ijlsm.v1i2.10579

Keywords:

EFL Students, Agility, Online Learning; Gender

Abstract

This study attempts to investigate the agility of male and female senior high EFL students of SMA Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar in online learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. The study employs the theory of learning agility introduced by Gravatt and Caldwell (2016). As they stated, there are four dimensions of learning agility, namely; mental agility, people agility, results in agility, and change agility. The sampling technique used was random sampling. 150 students of X PMIA 1, 2, 3, and X PIS 1 and 2 were selected as the participants. The score of male students for all types of learning agility was 6798. While the score of female students for all types of learning agility was 6831. From 150 participants, the percentage of male students who had a high level of agility was 27,33%, while the female students were 26%. The percentage of male students who had a moderate la level of agility was 22,67%, while the female students were 78.33%. None of the male and female students had a low level of agility. The results showed that when it came to the o general calculation of scores, the female students were higher and more agile. However, when it was seen individually, especially in the learning activities, the male students had a higher level of agility rather than the female students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chiou, P. Z. (2020). Learning cytology in times of pandemic: an educational institutional experience with remote teaching. Journal of the American Society of Cytopathology, 9(6), 579–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2020.05.004

Dou, J., Qin, J., Jin, Z., & Li, Z. (2018). Knowledge graph based on domain ontology and natural language processing technology for Chinese intangible cultural heritage. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 48(30), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2018.06.005

Elshami, W., Taha, M. H., Abuzaid, M., Saravanan, C., Al Kawas, S., & Abdalla, M. E. (2021). Satisfaction with online learning in the new normal: perspective of students and faculty at medical and health sciences colleges. Medical Education Online, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.1920090

Häfner, P., Häfner, V., & Ovtcharova, J. (2013). Teaching methodology for virtual reality practical course in engineering education. Procedia Computer Science, 25, 251–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.11.031

Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.9

Huang, S., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Exploring the integration of automated feedback among lower-proficiency EFL learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1471083

Ipe, T. S., Goel, R., Howes, L., & Bakhtary, S. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on academic productivity by female physicians and researchers in transfusion medicine. Transfusion, 61(6), 1690–1693. https://doi.org/10.1111/TRF.16306

Joia, L. A., & Lorenzo, M. (2021). Zoom in, zoom out: The impact of the covid-19 pandemic in the classroom. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052531

Mohammad Zayed, N. (2014). Jordanian EFL Teachers’ and Students’ Practice of Speech Acts in the Classroom. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature (IJSELL), 2(5), 1–10.

O’Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector-Cohen, E. (2019). The Role of Pedagogical Mentoring in Virtual Exchange. TESOL Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.543

Piller, I., & Gerber, L. (2021). Family language policy between the bilingual advantage and the monolingual mindset. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(5), 622–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1503227

Wong, J., Baars, M., Davis, D., Van Der Zee, T., Houben, G. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Supporting Self-Regulated Learning in Online Learning Environments and MOOCs: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 35(4–5), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1543084

Downloads

Published

2023-06-30